Е.Н. Моргачева. Современное состояние инклюзивного образования детей и подростков с интеллектуальными нарушениями в США

УДК: 376.3

DOI: 10.47639/0130-3074_2023_4_24

Заголовок

Современное состояние инклюзивного образования детей и подростков с интеллектуальными нарушениями в США

Моргачёва Елена Николаевна. Доктор педагогических наук, доцент. доцент кафедры специальной педагогики и комплексной реабилитации, Московский городской педагогический университет, г. Москва, Российская Федерация, ORCID: 0000-0003-2330-6128, e-mail: elmorgacheva@yandex.ru

Научная специальность ВАК: 5.8.3. коррекционная педагогика

Тип статьи: информационно-аналитическая

Страницы: 24-34

Аннотация. Статья носит информационно-аналитический характер. В статье представлены основные изменения, произошедшие за последние двадцать лет в теории и практике инклюзивного образования; рассматриваются стратегии, методические приемы обучения детей и подростков с интеллектуальной недостаточностью; содержание и процедура итоговой аттестации; перспективы получения образования после окончания школы, возможности и условия успешного трудоустройства. Рассматриваются дискуссионные вопросы инклюзивного образования.

Ключевые слова: универсальный дизайн обучения, методические приемы, комплексные программы переходного периода, образование после школы; высшее образование, программы индивидуальной поддержки, программы двойного зачисления.

Для цитирования: Моргачева Е.Н. Современное состояние инклюзивного образования детей и подростков с интеллектуальными нарушениями в США. // Дефектология. 2023. № 4. С. 24. DOI: 10.47639/0130-3074_2023_4_24

Informational and analytical article

ОПИСАНИЕ НА АНГЛИЙСКОМ ЯЗЫКЕ:

Current status of inclusive education for people with intellectual disabilities in the United States

Elena N. Morgacheva. Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Special Pedagogy and Integrated Rehabilitation, Moscow City Pedagogical University, Moscow, Russian Federation ORCID: 0000-0003-2330-6128, e-mail: elmorgacheva@yandex.ru

Abstract. The article is informational and analytical.The article deals with the major changes which took place during the last twenty years in the sphere of special and inclusive education of children, teenagers, young people with intellectual disabilities in the USA; it deals with the modern strategies, achievements in approaches and methodological methods of teaching, issues connected with final examinations, employment and opportunities of getting education after school, including-higher education.

Keywords: universal design for learning, learning strategies, assessment, comprehensive transitional programs, internships, substantially separate programs, blended programs, inclusive individual support programs, dual enrollment programs.

For citation: Morgacheva E.N. The current state of inclusive education of children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities in the USA. // Defectology. 2023. № 4. Р. 24. DOI: 10.47639/0130-3074_2023_4_24

Список источников

1.            Alqazlana S., Alallawic B., Totsikad V. Post-secondary education for young people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review of stakeholders’ experiences Educational Research Review. 2019. Volume 28, 100295.

2.            Alwell M., Cobb B. Functional life skills curricular interventions for youth with disabilities: A systematic review. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals. 2009. 32 (2), 82–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0885728809336656.

3.            Ayres K.M. Reconciling ecological educational planning with access to the common core: Putting the cart before the horse?: A response to Hunt and McDonnell. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities. 2012. 37 (3), 153–156. http://dx.doi. org/10.2511 /027494812804153516.

4.            Browder D.M., Jimenez B., Spooner F., Saunders A., Hudson M., & Bethune K. Early numeracy instruction for students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities. 2012. 37 (4), 308–320. http://dx.doi. org/10.2511/027494813805327205.

5.            Browder D.M., Trela K., Courtade G.R., Jimenez B.A., Knight, Flowers C. Teaching mathematics and science standards to students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities. The Journal of Special Education. 2012. 46 (1), 26–35. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0022466910369942.

6.            Browder D.M. & Spooner F. More language arts, math, and science for students with severe disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes. 2014.

7.            Browder D.M„ Gibbs S., Ahlgrim-Delzell L., Courtade G.R., Mraz M., Flowers C. Literacy for students with severe developmental disabilities: What should we teach and what should we hope to achieve? Remedial and Special Education. 2009. 30, 269–282. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0741932508315054.

8.            Carter E.W., Austin D. & Trainor A.A. Predictors of postschool employment outcomes for young adults with severe disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies. 2012. 23 (1), 50–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1044207311414680.

9.            Carter E.W., Brock M.E. & Trainor A.A. Transition assessment and planning for youth with severe intellectual and developmental disabilities. The Journal of Special Education. 2014. 47 (4), 245–255. http://dx.doi.Org/10.l 177/0022466912456241.

10.         Certo N.J., Luecking R.G., Murphy S., Brown L., Courey S. & Belanger D. Seamless transition and long-term support for individuals with severe intellectual disabilities. Research and practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities. 2008. 33 (3), 85–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.2511/ rpsd.33.3.85.

11.         Coyne P., Pisha B., Dalton B., Zeph L.A. & Smith N.C. Literacy by design: A universal design for learning approach for students with significant intellectual disabilities. Remedial and Special Education. 2012. 33 (3), 162–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177.

12.         Dymond S.K., Renzaglia A., Rosenstein A., Chun E.J., Banks R.A., Niswander V., Gilson C. Using a participatory action research approach to create a universally designed inclusive high school science course: A case study. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities. 2006. 31 (4), 293–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154079690603100403.

13.         Fuchs D., Fuchs L.S. (1994) Inclusive school movement and radicalization of special education reform. Exceptional children. 1994. 60, 4, 294–309.

14.         Grigal M., Papay C., Smith F., Hard D., Verbeck R. Experiences That Predict Employment for Students With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities in Federally Funded Higher Education Programs. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals. 2018. 42 (12):216514341881335. DOI: 10.1177/2165143418813358.

15.         Grigal M., Hart D. & Weir C. A survey of postsecondary education programs for students with intellectual disabilities in the United States. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities. 2012. 9 (4), 223–233. http://dx.doi.org/10.llll/jppi.12012.

16.         Grigal M., Hart D., Smith F.A., Domin D., Sulewski J., Weir C. Think College National Coordinating Center: Annual report on the transition and postsecondary programs for students with intellectual disabilities (2012-2013). Boston, MA: University of Massachusetts Boston, Institute for Community Inclusion. 2014.

17.         Hetherington S.A., Durant-Jones L., Johnson K., Nolan K., Smith E., Taylor-Brown S. & Tuttle J. The lived experiences of adolescents with disabilities and their parents in transition planning. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities. 2010. 25 (3), 163–172.

18.         Hunt P., McDonnell J., Crockett M. Reconciling an ecological curricular framework focusing on quality of life outcomes with the development and instruction of standards- based academic goals. Research and Practice in Severe Disabilities. 2012. 37 (3), 139–152. http://dx.doi.org/10.2511/02749481280415347.

19.         Jimenez B., Staples K. Access to common core state standards through early numeracy skill building for students with moderate intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities. 2015. 50 (1), 17–30. Retrieved from http://daddcec.org/.

20.         Kauffman J.M. How we might archive the radical reform of special education. Exceptional Children. 1993. 60, 6–16.

21.         Kearns J.F. (Eds.). Alternate assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities: An educator’s guide. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes. 2010.

22.         Noonan P.N., Morningstar M.E., Gaumer Erickson A. Improving interagency collaboration: Effective strategies used by high performing local districts and communities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals. 2008. 31 (3), 132–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 0885728808327149.

23.         Papay C., Grigal M., Hart D., Kwan N. & Smith F.A. Predictors of inclusive course enrollments in higher education by students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-56.6.458

24.         Papay C., Trivedi K., Smith F., and Grigal M. One year after exit: A first look at outcomes of students who completed TPSIDs. Think College Fast Facts, Issue. 2017. № 17. Boston, MA: University of Massachusetts Boston, Institute for Community Inclusion.

25.         Quenemoen R., Kearns J., Quenemoen M., Flowers, CKleinert H. Common misperceptions and research-based recommendations for alternate assessment based on alternate achievement standards (Synthesis Report 73). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. 2014.

26.         Quenemoen R.F. & Thurlow M.L. AA-AAS: Standards that are the “same but different (NCSC Brief #1). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center and State Collaborative). 2015, June.

27.         Ross J., Marcell J., Williams P., Carlson D. Postsecondary education employment and independent living outcomes of persons with autism and intellectual disability. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability. 2013. 26 (4), 337–351.

28.         Rutkowski S., Daston M., Van Kuiken, Riehle E. Project SEARCH: A demand-side model of high school transition. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation. 2010. 25 (2), 85–96.

29.         Ryndak D., Jackson L.B., White J.M. Involvement and progress in the general curriculum for students with extensive support needs: K-12 inclusive-education research and implications for the future. Inclusion. 2013. 1 (1), 28–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-Ll.028.

30.         Shogren K.A. & Wehmeyer M.L. Using the core concepts framework to understand three generations of inclusive practices. Inclusion. 2014. 2 (3), 237–247. http://dx.doi. org/10.1352/2326-6988-2.3.237.

31.         Shogren K.A., Wehmeyer M.L., Palmer S.B., Rifenbark G.G. & Little T.D. Relationships between self-determination and postsecondary outcomes for youth with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education. 2013. Advance online publication, http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0022466913489733.

32.         Smith F., Grigal M. & Shepard J. Impact of Postsecondary Education on Employment Outcomes of Youth with Intellectual Disability Served by Vocational Rehabilitation. Think College Fast Facts, Issue. 2018. № 18. Boston, MA: University of Massachusetts Boston, Institute for Community Inclusion.

33.         Thurlow M.L. Instructional and assessment accommodations in the 21st century. In L. Florian (Ed.), The Sage handbook of special education. 2014. (2nd ed pp. 597–631). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

34.         Wehman P., Sima A., Ketchum J.M., West M.D., Chan F. & Luecking R. Predictors of successful transition from school to employment for youth with disabilities. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2015. 25 (2), 323–334. doi: 10.1007/s10926-014-9541-6 Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) of 2014, P.L. 113- 128, 128 Stat. 1425, 29 U.S.C. §§3101 et seq.