Эггерс К. Темперамент и исполнительные функции у детей с заиканием: обзор исследований

Тип статьи: информационно-аналитическая

Страницы: 67

Автор:

Эггерс Курт,

доктор философии. Университет им. Томаса Мора, Антверпен, Бельгия. Научный сотрудник/доцент факультета логопедии и аудиологии. Профессор факультета психологии и логопедии.Университет Турку, Финляндия,

E-mail: kurt.eggers@thomasmore.be

Аннотация:

Аннотация:

В статье представлен обзор результатов изучения темперамента и исполнительных функций у детей с заиканием 3, 4–10 лет и у детей того же возраста и пола без заикания. У детей с заиканием установлен более высокий показатель негативной реактивности и более низкий показатель саморегуляции, определяющий у них сниженный контроль поведения и ориентировки. Полученные результаты подтверждают гипотезу об отличии темперамента и некоторых процессов саморегуляции у детей с заиканием в сравнении с детьми без заикания.

Ключевые слова: заикание, дети, темперамент, реагирование, саморегуляция, исполнительные функции, внимание.

ОПИСАНИЕ НА АНГЛИЙСКОМ ЯЗЫКЕ:

Temperament and Executive Functioning in Children with Developmental Stuttering: An Overview

Author:

Kurt Eggers

Ph.D., Researcher/Docent, Dept. of Speech-Language Therapy and Audiology, Thomas More University College, Antwerp, Belgium; Professor of Practice, European Clinical Specialization Course on Fluency Disorders; Dept. of Psychology and Speech-Language Pathology, University of Turku, Finland

E-mail: kurt.eggers@thomasmore.be

Annotation.

The article provides an overview of some our research findings on temperament and executive functioning in children who stutter (CWS), ranging between 3;04 and 10;00 and a gender- and age-matched control group of children who do not stutter (CWNS). CWS, as a group, scored higher on negative reactivity and lower on self-regulation. Questionnaire-based findings of lower self-regulation were corroborated by the findings on neurocognitive computer paradigms showing CWS to have a lower efficiency of inhibitory control, attentional orienting and attentional set-shifting. These findings provide support for the hypothesis that CWS and CWNS differ on temperament and several self-regulatory processes.

Key words: stuttering, children, temperament, reactivity, self-regulation, executive functioning, attention.

Литература

1. Контур Эд., Валдэн Т.А. Двойная диатезо-стрессорная модель заикания // Теоретические проблемы нарушений плавности речи: коллективная монография / под ред. Ю.О. Филатовой. М., 2012. С. 94–127.

2. Alm P.A. Stuttering and the basal ganglia circuits: a critical review of possible relations // Journal of Communication Disorders. 2004. Vol. 37. Pp. 325–369.

3. Anderson J.D., Pellowski M.W., Conture E.D., Kelly E.M. Temperamental characteristics of young children who stutter // Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research. 2003. Vol. 46. Pp. 1221–1233.

4. Anderson J.D., Wagovich S.A. Relationships among linguistic processing speed, phonological working memory, and attention in children who stutter // Journal of Fluency Disorders. 2010. Vol. 35. Pp. 216–234.

5. Aron A.R., Durston S., Eagle D.M., Logan G.D., Stinear C.M., Stuphorn V. Converging evidence for a fronto-basal-ganglia network for inhibitory control of action and cognition // Journal of Neuroscience. 2007. Vol. 31. Pp. 11860–11864.

6. Bernstein Ratner N., Wijnen F. The vicious cycle: Linguistic encoding, self monitoring and stuttering // Seminar presented at the Fifth World Congress of the International Fluency Association. Dublin, 2006.

7. Bijttebier P., Roeyers H. Temperament and vulnerability to psychopathology: Introduction to the special section // Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 2009. Vol. 37. Pp. 305–308.

8. Bloodstein O., Bernstein-Ratner N. A handbook on stuttering (6th Ed.). New York, 2008.

9. Bosshardt H.G. Cognitive processing load as a determinant of stuttering: Summary of a research program // Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics. 2006. Vol. 20. Pp. 371–385.

10. Carlson S., Wang T. Inhibitory control and emotion regulation in preschool children // Cognitive Development. 2007. Vol. 22. Pp. 489–510.

11. Chambers C.D., Garavan H., Bellgrove M.A. Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience // Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 2009. Vol. 33. Pp. 631–646.

12. Conture E.G., Walden T.A., Arnold H.S., Graham C.G., Hartfield K.N., Karrass J.A. communication-emotional model of stuttering // Current issues in stuttering research and practice; A. Bernstein Ratner & J. Tetnowski (Eds.). Mahwah, New Jersey, 2006. Pp. 17–46.

13. De Sonneville L.M.J. Amsterdamse Neuropsychologische Taken. Amsterdam Neuropsychological tasks. Amsterdam, 2009.

14. Eggers K. Responsinhibitie bij volwassen personen die stotteren versus niet stotteren [Response inhibtion in adults who stutter versus adults who do not stutter] // Logopedie [Logopedics]. 2012. July-August Issue, Pp. 76–83.

15. Eggers K., De Nil L., Van den Bergh B. Factorial temperament structure in stuttering, voice disordered, and normal speaking children // Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2009. Vol. 52. Pp. 610–1622.

16. Eggers K., De Nil L., Van den Bergh B. Temperament dimensions in stuttering and typically developing children // Journal of Fluency Disorders. 2010. Vol. 35. Pp. 355–372.

17. Eggers K., De Nil L., Van den Bergh B.  The efficiency of attentional networks in children who stutter // Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2012. Vol. 55. Pp. 946–959.

18. Eggers K., De Nil L.F., Van Den Bergh B.R.H. Inhibitory control in childhood stuttering // Journal of Fluency Disorders. 2013. Vol. 38. Pp. 1–13.  

19. Embrechts M., Ebben H., Franke P., van de Poel C. Temperament: A comparison between children who stutter and children who don’t stutter // Proceedings of the Third World Congress on Fluency Disorders: Theory, research, treatment, and self-help; H.G. Bosshardt, J.S. Yaruss, H.F.M. Peters (Eds.). Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 2000. Pp. 557–562.

20. Engelhardt P.E., Corley M., Nigg J.T., Ferreira, F. The role of inhibition in the production of disfluencies // Memory and Cognition. 2010. Vol. 38. Pp. 617–628.

21. Ezrati-Vinacour R., Levin I. The relationship between anxiety and stuttering: A multidimensional approach // Journal of Fluency Disorders. 2004. Vol. 29. Pp. 135–148.

22. Fan J., McCandliss B.D., Sommer T., Raz A., Posner M.I. Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks // Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2002. Vol. 14. Pp. 340–347.

23. Felsenfeld F., van Beijsterveldt C.E.M., Boomsma D.I. Attentional regulation in young twins with probable stuttering, high nonfluency, and typical fluency // Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2010. Vol. 53. Pp. 1147–1166.

24. Harman C., Rothbart M.K., Posner M.I. Distress and attention interactions in early infancy // Motivation & Emotion. 1997. Vol. 21. Pp. 27–43.

25. Johnson K.N., Conture E.G., Walden T.A. Efficacy of attention regulation in preschool-age children who stutter: A preliminary investigation // Journal of Communication Disorders.2012. Vol. 45. Pp. 263–278.

26. Karrass J., Walden T.A., Conture E.G., Graham C.G., Arnold H.S., Hartfield K.N., Schwenk K.A. Relation of emotional reactivity and regulation to childhood stuttering // Journal of Communication Disorders. 2006. Vol. 39. Pp. 402–423.

27. Kochanska G., Murray K., Jacques T.Y., Koenig A.L., Vandegeest K.A. Inhibitory control in young children and its role in emerging internalization // Child Development. 1996. Vol. 67. Pp. 490–507.

28. Lonigan C.J., Vasey M.W. Negative Affectivity, Effortful Control, and Attention to Threat-Relevant Stimuli // Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 2009. Vol. 37. Pp. 387–399.

29. Menzies R., Onslow M., Packman A. Anxiety and stuttering: Exploring a complex relationship // American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 1999. Vol. 8. Pp. 3–10.

30. Ntourou K., Conture E.G., Walden T.A. Emotional reactivity and regulation in preschool-age children who stutter // Journal of Fluency Disorders. 2013. Vol. 38. Pp. 260–274.

31. Rothbart M.K. Becoming who we are. Temperament and personality in development. New York, NY, 2011.

32. Rothbart M.K., Ahadi S.A., Hershey K.L., Fisher P. Investigation of temperament at three to seven years: The Children’s Behavior Questionnaire // Child Development. 2001. Vol. 72. Pp. 1394–1408.

33. Rueda M.R., Fan J., McCandliss B.D., Halparin J.D., Gruber D.B., Lercari L.P., Posner M.I. Development of attentional networks in childhood // Neuropsychologica. 2004. Vol. 42. Pp. 1029–1040.

34. Schwenk K.A., Conture E.G., Walden T.A. Reaction to background stimulation of preschool children who do and do not stutter // Journal of Communication Disorders. 2007. Vol. 40. Pp. 129–141.

35. Smits-Banstra S., De Nil L.F. Sequence skill learning in persons who stutter: Implications for cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical dysfunction // Journal of Fluency Disorders. 2007. Vol. 32. Pp. 251–278.

36. Van den Bergh B., Ackx M. Een Nederlandse versie van Rothbarts ‘Children’s Behavior Questionnaire’. [The Dutch version of Rothbart’s Children’s Behavior Questionnaire] // Kind en Adolescent. 2003. Vol. 24. Pp. 77–84.